I'm doing this on an early (86-88) ZC rebuild. From my investigations, the PM7 pistons have a larger dome capacity (7.2 cc) which raises the compression compared to the PG6B (1.5cc) , but they sit 1 mm lower in the hole (29 mm as opposed to 30mm distance to the centre of the pin from the top edge of the piston) which then loses some of the gain in compression. The PG6B pistons are flush with the top of the head, the PM7's sit below. The standard compression ratios are supposed to be 9.34 for the PG6B, and 9.56 for the PM7
Mill the block 1mm the PM7 pistons will get you 10.5. You can't/shouldn't mill the block with PG6B. and the PM7 and PG29 are supposed to be identical.
There are a couple of compression ratio calculators around which you can plug in blocks, pistons, gasket thickness, how much the head in milled and the block decked, rods etc, and boost; and get a cr figure. If you've worked in the combustion chamber to deshroud the valves you have to guesstimate the difference. It's an interesting exercise - thats where some of the above comes from
I have both sets of pistons available now, and once I have one PM7 on a rod I'll put it in and compare the valve clearances before deciding what to do for milling the block. FI, I have already milled the head 30 thou inch, and I'm waiting on a web cam to arrive, I'll post up the results when its done.
anjin aka Ian
"I can't believe it - Ive just been passed by a sh!tbox"