Edited by E-AT86, 13 June 2010 - 03:23 PM.
0
Are All The 84-87 Civic Conecting Rods The Same?
Started by E-AT86, Jun 13 2010 02:38 PM
10 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 13 June 2010 - 02:38 PM
i need to know if the dx and the si conecting rods of the crx/civic are the same are they all pe1????let me now!!
#2
Posted 13 June 2010 - 05:01 PM
Edit.
#3
Posted 13 June 2010 - 05:39 PM
QUOTE (Aren D. @ Jun 13 2010, 06:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
They are not the same the si conecting rod are more beefy, but they are interchangable.
by beefy u mean???and do u know were can i get a stock si rod..or can i use the ew1 rod??i only need 1!!!
#4
Posted 13 June 2010 - 10:16 PM
There is no difference between the DX and the Si rods. The Si rod is no stronger or weaker than the DX unit.
They both however, are substantially stronger than the HF (which I think is the EW1?) rods, which are NOT interchangeable with the DX/Si rods.
Jay
They both however, are substantially stronger than the HF (which I think is the EW1?) rods, which are NOT interchangeable with the DX/Si rods.
Jay
If you love the Elise, drive a Se7en - Caterham or whatever...
It has even less content than the Elise, is less graceful looking
...and changes direction like a ping pong ball whacked by Thor.
#5
Posted 14 June 2010 - 07:25 AM
QUOTE (jsgprod @ Jun 13 2010, 11:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
There is no difference between the DX and the Si rods. The Si rod is no stronger or weaker than the DX unit.
They both however, are substantially stronger than the HF (which I think is the EW1?) rods, which are NOT interchangeable with the DX/Si rods.
Jay
so iam able to interchange only the dx/si connecting rods.so the ew2-ew4 are interchangable if im correct? thanks guys They both however, are substantially stronger than the HF (which I think is the EW1?) rods, which are NOT interchangeable with the DX/Si rods.
Jay
#6
Posted 14 June 2010 - 10:54 AM
QUOTE (jsgprod @ Jun 13 2010, 08:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
There is no difference between the DX and the Si rods. The Si rod is no stronger or weaker than the DX unit.
They both however, are substantially stronger than the HF (which I think is the EW1?) rods, which are NOT interchangeable with the DX/Si rods.
Jay
They both however, are substantially stronger than the HF (which I think is the EW1?) rods, which are NOT interchangeable with the DX/Si rods.
Jay
All 1.5L rods are the same, EW1 and up.
The 1.3L (EV1,2) rods are different, to make up the difference in displacement. They are also thinner and weaker, as mentioned.
Cheers,
Mark
#7
Posted 14 June 2010 - 11:19 AM
QUOTE (Rampage @ Jun 14 2010, 11:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
All 1.5L rods are the same, EW1 and up.
The 1.3L (EV1,2) rods are different, to make up the difference in displacement. They are also thinner and weaker, as mentioned.
Cheers,
Mar
thanks guys... now i can finish my 1986 civic si my brother ran it while it was overheating.lol the rod bent so its going throught a restoration painted green engine bay and going back to white out side...The 1.3L (EV1,2) rods are different, to make up the difference in displacement. They are also thinner and weaker, as mentioned.
Cheers,
Mar
#8
Posted 14 June 2010 - 11:20 AM
QUOTE (Rampage @ Jun 14 2010, 11:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
All 1.5L rods are the same, EW1 and up.
That's not exactly true Mark. The 1.5 HF rods have pretty much the same dimensions as the 1.3 rods. I still have a set of these in my garage.
Left to right, 1.5 HF (85), 1.5 Si, & 1.6 D16A1.
Both the big end and the small ends of the HF rods have smaller diameters than the other two also.
Jay
If you love the Elise, drive a Se7en - Caterham or whatever...
It has even less content than the Elise, is less graceful looking
...and changes direction like a ping pong ball whacked by Thor.
#9
Posted 14 June 2010 - 06:51 PM
Ah, I remeber that picture, too.
So basically any 1.5L non-HF (thats CVCC?) rod should work.
Thats what I get for living in Canada, where its 1.3L, 1.5L, and Si only, no HF, cvcc, emissions, power loss...
So basically any 1.5L non-HF (thats CVCC?) rod should work.
Thats what I get for living in Canada, where its 1.3L, 1.5L, and Si only, no HF, cvcc, emissions, power loss...
#10
Posted 15 June 2010 - 12:39 PM
QUOTE (Rampage @ Jun 14 2010, 07:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thats what I get for living in Canada, where its 1.3L, 1.5L, and Si only, no HF, cvcc, emissions, power loss...
So you didn't get the HF, no big deal. But you guys DID get the best 12 valve EW head they made for these. The PE3.
If you love the Elise, drive a Se7en - Caterham or whatever...
It has even less content than the Elise, is less graceful looking
...and changes direction like a ping pong ball whacked by Thor.
#11
Posted 15 June 2010 - 01:44 PM
QUOTE (jsgprod @ Jun 15 2010, 10:39 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
So you didn't get the HF, no big deal. But you guys DID get the best 12 valve EW head they made for these. The PE3.
Hate to thread jack....
I'm building a D15A3 for my CRX... nothing special, just a re-ring, stage 1 cam, valve spring mod...
Should I throw a PE3 head on there in lieu of the PE7? Little more compression and maybe better knock resistance?