A better title may be "am I looking at this correctly?"
I've been drinking some really good ZingZang bloody Mary's but I'll try to stay focused. I used to mess around with air cooled VW's and got to wondering if the torsion bars on these Hondas could be adjusted similarly. I counted the splines on both ends of the Teg and CRX bars and found that the big end has 40 splines (9* per spline) and the small end has 37 splines (9.73* per spline) so I'm thinking they can be adjusted in .73* increments versus the ol' one spline is probably too much method. By the one spline method, 9* (torque tube end) lowers the front by 2.12" and indexing the smaller front end lowers it by 2.29". Some math:
360*/40 = 9*
360*/37 = 9.73* (roughly)
I also did some rough measuring from the center of the torsion bar to the rotor hub flange. I came up with approximately 16.5". It was close to 13.5 from the center of the T-bar to the ball joint but decided to use the rotor flange. More math:
13.5" X 2 X Pi = 84.82
84.82 / 360* = .235 (rounded)
.235 X .73 = .172 (again rounded)
So my theory is the T-bars are adjustable in .17" increments. If I'm missing something, please correct me or if this has been covered on here before, please shoot me now.....
The front (small end) with 37 splines should travel .73* (.17") faster than the larger 40 spline tube end. Correct?
So, looking from the front at the driver's side, if the bar is indexed one spline clockwise in the torque tube and one spline counter clockwise in the radius arm, you lose .73* (.17") in ride height. Is it really that easy? Hopefully, someone more intelligent thanI will please verify. Oh, the passenger side will be a mirror opposite of what I just said.
From factory setting being zero, you can figure what it would lower per spline. 1 spline as I estimated above or; a little more math
2 CW on the rear and 2 CCW on the front = .34" lower
3= .51"
4= .68"
5= .85"
6= 1.02"
7= 1.19"
8= 1.36"
9= 1.53"
10= 1.7"
11= 1.87"
Or 12 each direction would be 2.04" almost 9* (8.76*) or one spline on the big end.
13= 2.21" (9.49*) or close to one spline on the small end of 9.73*
I hope when I'm sober I don't look at this and wonder WTF.... HAHA!Edit: I already think the ball joint measurement of 13.5" is more accurate. I will do that math also but I'm sure someone is checking already. It would make sense that the radius arc would end where the ball joint pivots since it is inside the tire tread already. I'll do this again tomorrow, sober. It will be .172" vs .211" per .73*
Edited by Dirtcircle86, 27 January 2014 - 05:50 PM.