Jump to content




D15a3 Potential?


  • You cannot reply to this topic
37 replies to this topic

#1
RexBoy21

  • Slowpoke
  • PipPip
    • Group: Members
    • Location:Bay Area, CA
    • Drives: '87 CRX Si
i have a d15a3. does the engine have a lot of potential? i was wondering because i dont hear too much about modding the engine out or anything. mostly talk about the d16a1 and stuff. i personally like the sound of the d15a3 when it hit like 4-6 grand on the tach.

Edited by RexBoy21, 12 April 2005 - 06:18 PM.


#2
cbstdscott

  • Swap in HF drums, check your cam timing
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: 2015 Contributor
    • Location:CRX Heaven, Los Angeles
    • Drives: '87 CRX Si, '07 Civic Si Sedan, '15 Scion FRS
    • Image Gallery
RexBoy,

You are my homie! I too am a fan of the bastard step-child of the Honda family.

Long story short, the D15A3 has maybe the strongest bottom end of any Honda engine and an ideal rod ratio. It also is handicapped with a restrictive intake side of the head and a serious lack of aftermarket support.

But do not dispair! All you have to do is to think like a 1950's hot rodder to make some serious power in the beloved beast. I am making ~120hp at the crank (up from 91 stock) with a mostly stock bottom end and lot of mods to the top end.

It is possible to make ~200hp NA and if you are brave you can put the squeeze on the engine and make a good chunk more. But those configurations are not destined for a long life.

Here is your clue: Get more air and fuel into the cylinders IN THE CORRECT RATIO. Do not worry about the fuel delivery system or the ignition, they are fine in stock form. Concentrate on head, cam and throttlebody improvements.


Scott
Posted Image

Form Follows Function

#3
Omega Mugen

  • Dug Diggler
  • PipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: 2009 Contributing Member
    • Location:Silver Spring, MD
    • Drives: 87 CRX w/Si motor, 86 Civic DX Hatch, 2001 Prelude
QUOTE (cbstdscott @ Apr 12 2005, 07:22 PM)
Do not worry about the fuel delivery system or the ignition, they are fine in stock form.

Scott


I have begun work in the CRX laboratory to prove this statement wrong. I need to compete against new cars and their new technology. That is what motivates me.

Your right about the bottom end. It is a one piece crank girdle. In 1988, Honda switched to a two piece in the new generation D's then back because the one piece was superior.

Edited by Omega Mugen, 12 April 2005 - 07:46 PM.

Going to Hawaii? You need a Dune Buggy.

WTB: 14x8 or 9" Panasports or Watanabe RS.

WTB: 3g Civic hatch gauge cowl, brown.

 

WTB: ZC header--FOUND


#4
Omega Mugen

  • Dug Diggler
  • PipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: 2009 Contributing Member
    • Location:Silver Spring, MD
    • Drives: 87 CRX w/Si motor, 86 Civic DX Hatch, 2001 Prelude
QUOTE (cbstdscott @ Apr 12 2005, 07:22 PM)
Long story short, the D15A3 has maybe the strongest bottom end of any Honda engine and an ideal rod ratio. It also is handicapped with a restrictive intake side of the head and a serious lack of aftermarket support.




Scott,

Out of curiosity, what makes you say so?

Going to Hawaii? You need a Dune Buggy.

WTB: 14x8 or 9" Panasports or Watanabe RS.

WTB: 3g Civic hatch gauge cowl, brown.

 

WTB: ZC header--FOUND


#5
jsgprod

  • The Beach....The only place where salt LOWERS your blood pressur
  • PipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: 2009 Contributing Member
    • Location:Florida
    • Drives: 2017 Camaro 1LE and 2001 F250 SD
    • Image Gallery
QUOTE (cbstdscott @ Apr 12 2005, 07:22 PM)
Long story short, the D15A3 has maybe the strongest bottom end of any Honda engine and an ideal rod ratio.

Scott


I wouldn't go so far as to say that it's ideal, CLOSE, but not quite. The rod/stroke ratio for these is less than 1.7:1. That, from what I've read, is what Honda themselves have figured is an ideal rod/stroke ratio. Which just happens to be what their 'Type R' motors have.

Of course, back when I was in high school the hot number was 1.9:1. A number that just happened to be what you'd get with stock Chevy small block rods and their 3" stroke crankshaft (283/302).

Jay

If you love the Elise, drive a Se7en - Caterham or whatever...
It has even less content than the Elise, is less graceful looking
...and changes direction like a ping pong ball whacked by Thor.

scull+gif+1.gif

jsgprods Gallery


#6
xxine3dmon3yxx

  • Slowpoke
  • PipPip
    • Group: Members
    • Location:St. Petersburg, FL
    • Drives: 1986 Honda CRX DX
ummm.....what is a rod ratio? this is something that i have never heard about. what does it have to do with performance? sorry im ignorant...

#7
IfTakumiDroveACRX

  • Can't stop the greatness in motion....just you wait...
  • PipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: Contributing Member
    • Location:Baldwin Park, CA
    • Drives: 85 crx Si two-tone black/grey, 72 Datsun 510 with an experimental rotary swap (the engine is a 12a and 13b hybrid), Infiniti G35 sedan on air suspension rolling on 19" G-Corp's Estatus wheels and various Garson/D.A.D accessories
    • Image Gallery
QUOTE (RexBoy21 @ Apr 12 2005, 06:18 PM)
i personally like the sound of the d15a3 when it hit like 4-6 grand on the tach.




I know the sound and the feeling man !!! that's why i still run the d15a3 !!!! i love getting the rpm to about 4 grand then punching it !!!! It feels like vtec without the whiny sound hahahahahahahahaha !!!!! tongue.gif
user posted image
www.implicit-autosports.com - Proud Distributors of Monkeyz-Tek Performance Parts

#8
eldo

  • Think outside the box horsepower
  • PipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: Members
    • Location:Richmond,B.C.Canada
    • Drives: 86CRX 68Chevelle 69GTO
    • Image Gallery
Definately stick with these EW motors until you learn all you can performance wise. (You can easily replace these motors for cheap) With only a cam change ,you can outrun stock 16a1's (1/2 hour to change a cam). Get some head porting, add a better induction and exhaust system, a way to map your fuel and timing curve, a bigger cam (Maybe even some nitrous or forced induction) and you will be seeing 13 second 1/4's.
I am jealous of the sound you guys still have- mine lost it with the turbo. (Turbo exhaust note sucks!)
Ed
86 Crx DX EW3 block EW2 ported head , Coltcams (nitrous/turbo Stage 2 Triflow )

T-25 with a blowthrough Keihin carb - 13 psi .

I'ma in the Carburetion Nation

#9
76kcfdeng

  • Go big or go home!
  • PipPipPip
    • Group: Contributing Member
    • Location:Wofford Heights, CA
    • Drives: 06 EVO,85crxSI,03ford f250 diesel,75 landcruiser, 76 280z race car,2006 nissan frontier
    • Image Gallery
    Garage View Garage
Stick with the ew and learn how to make more power with it. If it doesn't satisfy your need for speed you will then have a better idea of how to do a swap and make it run. I am staying with the ew because of weight and the desire to see what I can get out of it.
Glen
user posted image

user posted image
SportInjectedClub

#10
jsgprod

  • The Beach....The only place where salt LOWERS your blood pressur
  • PipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: 2009 Contributing Member
    • Location:Florida
    • Drives: 2017 Camaro 1LE and 2001 F250 SD
    • Image Gallery
Well it looks like I wasn’t exactly right about the R/S ratio in the Type-R engine after all.
I knew that there was an engine Honda had made with a R/S ratio of around 1.7:1. Turns out it was the B16A3, which was the 160 hp version of the Del-Sol Si from 93-97. It has a 1.74:1 ratio, the Type-R has a 1.58:1 ratio, which, as it turns out, is the same as what the D15A3 engines R/S ratio is.

Jay

If you love the Elise, drive a Se7en - Caterham or whatever...
It has even less content than the Elise, is less graceful looking
...and changes direction like a ping pong ball whacked by Thor.

scull+gif+1.gif

jsgprods Gallery


#11
3gencivic

  • civics rule
  • PipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: Contributing Member
    • Location:chilliwack BC
    • Drives: 01 jimmy4x4, 92 ranger custom longbox 2wd
cool info.
im also one that is staying with the ew engines im working with the carberater ones. the ew2, d15a1
with the mod to the carb that eldo didi i was able to get a highest highway run aobut 300k on the trip got 52 miles to a gallon so its a good highway engine now im tring to see what setup to do a tthe strip.
doing a staged cam webber carb 12lb f wheel.

#12
RexBoy21

  • Slowpoke
  • PipPip
    • Group: Members
    • Location:Bay Area, CA
    • Drives: '87 CRX Si
QUOTE (eldo @ Apr 13 2005, 02:04 AM)
Definately stick with these EW motors until you learn all you can performance wise. (You can easily replace these motors for cheap) With only a cam change ,you can outrun stock 16a1's (1/2 hour to change a cam). Get some head porting, add a better induction and exhaust system, a way to map your fuel and timing curve, a bigger cam (Maybe even some nitrous or forced induction) and you will be seeing 13 second 1/4's.
I am jealous of the sound you guys still have- mine lost it with the turbo. (Turbo exhaust note sucks!)



QUOTE (76kcfdeng @ Apr 13 2005, 09:24 AM)
Stick with the ew and learn how to make more power with it. If it doesn't satisfy your need for speed you will then have a better idea of how to do a swap and make it run. I am staying with the ew because of weight and the desire to see what I can get out of it.
Glen

wow thats some good advice. i never thought of it that way. i think i will stick with it. right now i have over 205,000 miles on it. what should i do? u can get ur valves cleaned or somthin right? although when my friend rebuilt his mustang engine he talked about replacing all the parts like valve springs, pistons etc. or shouldi just buy and swap a d15a3?

Edited by RexBoy21, 13 April 2005 - 07:36 PM.


#13
Omega Mugen

  • Dug Diggler
  • PipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: 2009 Contributing Member
    • Location:Silver Spring, MD
    • Drives: 87 CRX w/Si motor, 86 Civic DX Hatch, 2001 Prelude
QUOTE (RexBoy21 @ Apr 13 2005, 07:35 PM)
wow thats some good advice. i never thought of it that way. i think i will stick with it. right now i have over 205,000 miles on it. what should i do? u can get ur valves cleaned or somthin right? although when my friend rebuilt his mustang engine he talked about  replacing all the parts like valve springs, pistons etc. or shouldi just buy and swap a d15a3?


Well, you don't exactly clean the valves you can have the faces re-cut and lapped. That helps you power by getting rid of the leaks and so you'll have better compression and combustion. Then you have the valve to rocker arm clearances adjusted. That helps your valve timing for the same reason that a cam does. Also, when you get that high milage, it's good to get new piston rings and hone the cylinders wall if needed for the same reason, better compression and combusion.

Going to Hawaii? You need a Dune Buggy.

WTB: 14x8 or 9" Panasports or Watanabe RS.

WTB: 3g Civic hatch gauge cowl, brown.

 

WTB: ZC header--FOUND


#14
RexBoy21

  • Slowpoke
  • PipPip
    • Group: Members
    • Location:Bay Area, CA
    • Drives: '87 CRX Si
QUOTE (Omega Mugen @ Apr 13 2005, 08:00 PM)
Well, you don't exactly clean the valves you can have the faces re-cut and lapped.  That helps you power by getting rid of the leaks and so you'll have better compression and combustion.  Then you have the valve to rocker arm clearances adjusted.  That helps your valve timing for the same reason that a cam does.  Also, when you get that high milage, it's good to get new piston rings and hone the cylinders wall if needed for the same reason, better compression and combusion.

what else do i need to get the engine to run like new? i would like to do that first and then mod the engine. or should i just buy a one.

by the way, at precisionengine.com they sell d15a3/ew3. there are two types of this engine. the "premium longblock" and the "economy longblock". whats the difference?

#15
87MugenProCR-X

  • Just Drive...
  • PipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: 2010 Contributing Member
    • Location:San Diego, Ca
    • Drives: 84 Honda CRX, 94 Honda Civic 4dr, 95 Volvo 850 Turbo Wgn, 91 Mazda Miata
Economy isprobably referring to the Hf motor the other is probably referring to the Dx and Si motors.

Julian