Rpr's All Time Top 5 Quickest
RARECRX
19 Nov 2006
[quote=paul barela,Nov 16 2006, 08:00 AM]I ran 15.9@87 with a 2.9 60ft with a bone stock D16A1 in my CRX.
[/quote]
Im not at sea level, track elevation is 4300ft. The trans Am ran a 15.1 at 91.9mph and was freaking out that i trapped just 2mph slower with a slipping clutch. I heard the correction factor for the elevation here is 3/4 to 1 second slower.
[/quote]
dude are you guys not forgetting??? ELEVATION HAS little/ NO SIDE-EFFECTS ON A TURBO CAr.. YOU already are pressurizing above atmospheric pressure so outside pressure means nothing.. If I run 12.2 at 0 I will run 12.2 at 5000.. It really only hurts N/A vehicles..
Edited by etmydst, 19 November 2006 - 04:11 PM.
[/quote]
Im not at sea level, track elevation is 4300ft. The trans Am ran a 15.1 at 91.9mph and was freaking out that i trapped just 2mph slower with a slipping clutch. I heard the correction factor for the elevation here is 3/4 to 1 second slower.
[/quote]
dude are you guys not forgetting??? ELEVATION HAS little/ NO SIDE-EFFECTS ON A TURBO CAr.. YOU already are pressurizing above atmospheric pressure so outside pressure means nothing.. If I run 12.2 at 0 I will run 12.2 at 5000.. It really only hurts N/A vehicles..
Edited by etmydst, 19 November 2006 - 04:11 PM.
C8V6C
21 Nov 2006
QUOTE (zakats @ Nov 18 2006, 08:56 PM)
now that is a horrible excuse
hahaha, I want to get some pics up for you guys....the slicks look so badass on the thing
They are fuggin huge!But a little to wide for the struts...I think a 1in spacer should be enough room
therealtime
13 Dec 2006
lilbuddy's sig says 10.81@134 i think. i dont know any details though. my car is finally going back together, maybe i'll get some new times at the beginning of '07. still ew4 sohc turbo.
dnocrx
13 Dec 2006
QUOTE (therealtime @ Dec 13 2006, 10:29 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
lilbuddy's sig says 10.81@134 i think. i dont know any details though. my car is finally going back together, maybe i'll get some new times at the beginning of '07. still ew4 sohc turbo.
YES YOUR RIGHT WITH LILBUDDY'S TIME....HE'S STILL ON TOP
mordantly
26 Dec 2006
it kinda makes me laugh.. i have 2100lb 87 crx si, stock motor with various "massaging." about 2 years ago i gtech'd a 15.6 @ 92 mph. uphill on a slipping clutch. so why must all these guys resort to acura motors and or turbos in order to break 14s?? (obviously 12s have to be get there fudge packed) a sloppy shifter caused me to run a 17 flat the other day until i get drunk, grab the hobart and crawl under her. i had a 94 civic dx and that was one gutless d16 if i ever had one.
my theory: newer hondas = obese and less stamina
my theory: newer hondas = obese and less stamina
icebox187
24 May 2007
ok, last weekend i got the cyberdyne gauge to read in the 13's.... finally, 13.8, didnt think to check the top speed of the run though, but now that im finally there (13's), i will soon be traveling to richmond to try to get some slips. on the same day i had a late 90's model z28 throw me a rev at the light.... stayed 2-3 lengths in front of him up to 80 mph (in a 45) then he backed off... then i backed off, didnt complete the 1/4 mile at full throttle and finished with 14.0, so im pretty sure i can squeeze a little more tenths out of her.
<-- gives self pat on the back for making a dx a 13 second car NA, also kicks self in ass for dumping 4500 into a dx. still proud of the accomplishment though!
<-- gives self pat on the back for making a dx a 13 second car NA, also kicks self in ass for dumping 4500 into a dx. still proud of the accomplishment though!
