Jump to content




Dx Manifold 4 Turbo


  • You cannot reply to this topic
11 replies to this topic

#1
TribalHatch

  • Leadfoot
  • PipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: 2009 Contributing Member
    • Location:Vegas Son
    • Drives: 1986 Honda CiviC SI
why do u need a DX manifold for the turbo i mean i was gonna make a flange for my airsearch turbo but ....i mean wat does the DX mani more flow or something cuz im lost fellas

#2
dnocrx

  • www.wirednj.com
  • PipPip
    • Group: Contributing Member
    • Location:Guayanilla p.r. sometimes New Jersey
    • Drives: 87 crx zc boosted
QUOTE (TribalHatch @ Oct 21 2007, 09:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
why do u need a DX manifold for the turbo i mean i was gonna make a flange for my airsearch turbo but ....i mean wat does the DX mani more flow or something cuz im lost fellas

i think cause it's cheaper then spending a few hundred on a name brand one.it works fine wink.gif

Edited by dnocrx, 21 October 2007 - 12:49 PM.

RUN YOUR CAR NOT YOUR MOUTH

#3
EuphoricBlue

  • Leadfoot
  • PipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: 2011 Contributing Member
Becuase there are no turbo manifolds for our engines available that I know of, and because the SI manifold would put the turbo way too low for oil return. You could use any manifold you wanted, though, if you mounted the turbo mugen style.

#4
Forcefed Si

  • Slowpoke
  • PipPip
    • Group: 2010 Contributing Member
    • Location:Rexburg Idaho
    • Drives: turbo'ed 87 Civic Si Hatchback and a heavily modified jeep wrangler
because it cost 10 dollars at the junk yard and it perfectly positioned my turbo. the si mani is alot longer than the dx.

#5
TribalHatch

  • Leadfoot
  • PipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: 2009 Contributing Member
    • Location:Vegas Son
    • Drives: 1986 Honda CiviC SI
QUOTE (EuphoricBlue @ Oct 21 2007, 11:32 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Becuase there are no turbo manifolds for our engines available that I know of, and because the SI manifold would put the turbo way too low for oil return. You could use any manifold you wanted, though, if you mounted the turbo mugen style.



if i place the turbo mugen style ( that is behind he motor right ) wouldnt that give it alot of turbo lag

#6
sleepin87crx

  • Surf Ninja
  • PipPip
    • Group: Contributing Member
    • Location:diamond bar/richmond, CA
    • Drives: 87 crx
QUOTE (TribalHatch @ Oct 23 2007, 03:34 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
if i place the turbo mugen style ( that is behind he motor right ) wouldnt that give it alot of turbo lag


depending on the size of the turbo but either way lag isnt necessarily a bad thing some ppl call some turbo lag "traction control" hahah....imo just ge dx mani cheap, plentiful at junkyard, and simple...i would sell you mines but mines is all the way in the bay while im in so cal
dont gotta look good just work good

#7
syko_tek1


crxeditsmall.jpg

 


#8
EuphoricBlue

  • Leadfoot
  • PipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: 2011 Contributing Member
QUOTE (TribalHatch @ Oct 23 2007, 03:34 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
if i place the turbo mugen style ( that is behind he motor right ) wouldnt that give it alot of turbo lag


It depends if you are running a front mount intercooler or not. At low PSI an intercooler is somewhat optional. So the added langth of exhaust pile is repayed with much shorter langth of charge pipe. Also, if you do deside to run an intercooler, you could go Subaru style and have the intercooler mounted above the turbo and fed by a scoop or some fins through the hood. Again, shorter charge piping than front mount intercooler with conventionaly mounted turbo.

The only thing you really miss out on mounting it mugen style is a bit of thermal efficiency in the exhaust.

Edited by EuphoricBlue, 24 October 2007 - 07:23 PM.


#9
TribalHatch

  • Leadfoot
  • PipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: 2009 Contributing Member
    • Location:Vegas Son
    • Drives: 1986 Honda CiviC SI
QUOTE (syko_tek1 @ Oct 24 2007, 03:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>



thanks fella for gettin my stupidity question solved but yeah i did also go to the juck yard and say wat yall said but yeah i might jus get that

#10
EuphoricBlue

  • Leadfoot
  • PipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: 2011 Contributing Member
QUOTE (syko_tek1 @ Oct 24 2007, 03:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Is that turbo a CT-26 from a Supra?

#11
syko_tek1

QUOTE (EuphoricBlue @ Oct 25 2007, 08:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Is that turbo a CT-26 from a Supra?






Yes it is, I think its from an 89' but not certain. All it took to mount it was to open the bolt holes in the manifold just a little and turn the intake to a different angle in relation to the exhaust on the turbo.

crxeditsmall.jpg

 


#12
EuphoricBlue

  • Leadfoot
  • PipPipPipPipPip
    • Group: 2011 Contributing Member
QUOTE (syko_tek1 @ Oct 26 2007, 03:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yes it is, I think its from an 89' but not certain. All it took to mount it was to open the bolt holes in the manifold just a little and turn the intake to a different angle in relation to the exhaust on the turbo.


Thanks, I just wanted to know what one looked like mounted to a manifold, and it's perfect!

Looks like I'll be selling my other turbo in favor of the supra one.