Let’s pretend one of these is the new ’09 CRX. Which one would you buy
#1:
or
#2: The one in my signature
OR Neither...
Let me here it
1
Which One Would You Buy?
Started by rwdcrx, Jul 12 2008 06:29 AM
18 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 12 July 2008 - 06:29 AM
"Oversteer scares passengers, understeer scares drivers"
Freedom has a taste, a sweetness, that only those that have fought for it, know.
Freedom has a taste, a sweetness, that only those that have fought for it, know.
#2
Posted 12 July 2008 - 07:46 AM
#2 in your sig.
Once a woman is introduced to Colonel Angus, she'll settle for nothing less.
#3
Posted 12 July 2008 - 08:12 AM
#4
Posted 12 July 2008 - 08:55 AM
i can only see your sig, (again navy computers suck) but i like it, still wouldnt buy an intro model though, id wai a couple years
grimms mom
#5
Posted 12 July 2008 - 10:45 AM
Is that a CR-Z in the first picture? If so, that is closest to anything that will come to the market.
Not certain the Type R is going to be sold to the public. I can only dream of a K series in a 2800 lbs car. OK, let me rephrase that: A K series in a 2800 lbs car from the factory.
The last I heard, the CR-Z is going to be sold only as a hybrid.... but a sporting hybrid. My wife is counting the days when she can ditch her 335i BMW for the CR-Z.
Scott
Not certain the Type R is going to be sold to the public. I can only dream of a K series in a 2800 lbs car. OK, let me rephrase that: A K series in a 2800 lbs car from the factory.
The last I heard, the CR-Z is going to be sold only as a hybrid.... but a sporting hybrid. My wife is counting the days when she can ditch her 335i BMW for the CR-Z.
Scott
Form Follows Function
#6
Posted 12 July 2008 - 11:53 AM
that would be cool if they could re tool the insight factory's to make new crx's
i remember reading HT and a guy swaped a K into one and calld it the K-sight,lol
i remember reading HT and a guy swaped a K into one and calld it the K-sight,lol
Oh, you don't know if it's legal?
you're in california of coarse it's ILLEGAL!!!!!
you're in california of coarse it's ILLEGAL!!!!!
#7
Posted 12 July 2008 - 12:06 PM
#8
Posted 12 July 2008 - 10:05 PM
Hmmm
Ive driven the new CTR (was very nice)
Must say though for looks id chose number #2
Though id just rather a 1G crx
Ive driven the new CTR (was very nice)
Must say though for looks id chose number #2
Though id just rather a 1G crx
QUOTE(SHOGUNOVDDRK;835304)
the import scene has kinda become like emo's.... its killing itself whilst looking overdressed and in drag
QUOTE(phyregod;835835)
Sig worthy. But mine is full.
#9
Posted 13 July 2008 - 07:52 AM
QUOTE (cbstdscott @ Jul 12 2008, 08:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Is that a CR-Z in the first picture? If so, that is closest to anything that will come to the market.
Not certain the Type R is going to be sold to the public. I can only dream of a K series in a 2800 lbs car. OK, let me rephrase that: A K series in a 2800 lbs car from the factory.
The last I heard, the CR-Z is going to be sold only as a hybrid.... but a sporting hybrid. My wife is counting the days when she can ditch her 335i BMW for the CR-Z.
Scott
Not certain the Type R is going to be sold to the public. I can only dream of a K series in a 2800 lbs car. OK, let me rephrase that: A K series in a 2800 lbs car from the factory.
The last I heard, the CR-Z is going to be sold only as a hybrid.... but a sporting hybrid. My wife is counting the days when she can ditch her 335i BMW for the CR-Z.
Scott
No, it is not the cr-z. It's the '08 Euro Civic type R (3-door) they also have a 5 door.
Here is the CR-Z
and
This is the concept car the "real" one is going on sale in 2009 as a 2010 model. From what I've read that "concept" car is pretty close to the production model.
Edited by rwdcrx, 13 July 2008 - 07:55 AM.
"Oversteer scares passengers, understeer scares drivers"
Freedom has a taste, a sweetness, that only those that have fought for it, know.
Freedom has a taste, a sweetness, that only those that have fought for it, know.
#10
Posted 13 July 2008 - 10:37 AM
Its a nice thought, but its most likely over-engineered, which kind of takes away a lot of the enjoyment we all get from our cars.
#11
Posted 13 July 2008 - 01:06 PM
Sig pic for sure. Im suprised nobody has tried actually doing that to one.. I see a project coming on...
86 crx
#12
Posted 13 July 2008 - 02:30 PM
I'm surprised nobody likes the 3-door type R. Or is it that you only like it as a civic, not as a crx.
"Oversteer scares passengers, understeer scares drivers"
Freedom has a taste, a sweetness, that only those that have fought for it, know.
Freedom has a taste, a sweetness, that only those that have fought for it, know.
#13
Posted 13 July 2008 - 03:59 PM
QUOTE (rwdcrx @ Jul 13 2008, 07:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
this car would look 1,000 x better if they lowered the top of the back to give it a more stream line shape
Oh, you don't know if it's legal?
you're in california of coarse it's ILLEGAL!!!!!
you're in california of coarse it's ILLEGAL!!!!!
#14
Posted 13 July 2008 - 04:45 PM
QUOTE (84b18 @ Jul 13 2008, 02:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
this car would look 1,000 x better if they lowered the top of the back to give it a more stream line shape
I've read the drag coefficient was between .3-.25. .3 seems high and .25 seems low, I'd say .27. In any case it's pretty streamlined. Also the shape of the back has to do with the streamlining. I suspect that if the back were lower, the drag would be higher.
"Oversteer scares passengers, understeer scares drivers"
Freedom has a taste, a sweetness, that only those that have fought for it, know.
Freedom has a taste, a sweetness, that only those that have fought for it, know.
#15
Posted 14 July 2008 - 03:32 AM
im not liking the yellow or the white one as the rear is alot like the new 07 si ciivc i have an it BLOWS you cant see out the back over the rear i see sky that is it. the rear needs to get lowerd back down alot. like a good 5-6 inches to match the fornt of the car. thats my opinion though..